Kindley v. Moore

Fourth Circuit

Kindley v. Moore

45 F. App'x 299

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 10, 2002·No. No. 02-6897·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jessie Benjamin Kindley, Sr., a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A [300] (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Kindley’s motion to present interrogatories, deny his motion for production of documents, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Kind-ley v. Moore, No. CA-02-366-2 (E.D.Va. May 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jessie Benjamin Kindley, Sr., a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A [300] (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Kindley’s motion to present interrogatories, deny his motion for production of documents, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Kind-ley v. Moore, No. CA-02-366-2 (E.D.Va. May 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Kindley v. Moore, 45 F. App'x 299 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

45 F. App'x 299 (Kindley v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related