Kindley v. Hicks

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 10, 2002
Docket02-6732
StatusUnpublished

This text of Kindley v. Hicks (Kindley v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kindley v. Hicks, (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6732

JESSIE BENJAMIN KINDLEY, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SERGEANT HICKS, Corrections Officer; SGT. COLEMAN, Corrections Officer; CORPORAL HYTE, Corrections Officer; CORPORAL BOWERS, Corrections Officer; SERGEANT LEA, Corrections Officer; RON ANGELONE, Executive Director; DOCTOR WRAY, Physician - Mecklenburg Medical; DOCTOR STURMER, Physician; MRS. WETHERBEE, Head Nurse - Mecklenburg Medical; SERGEANT FAGAN, Internal Affairs,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-768-2)

Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 10, 2002

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jessie Benjamin Kindley, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Jessie Benjamin Kindley, Sr., appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Kindley’s motions for

discovery and production of documents and affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Kindley v. Hicks, No. CA-01-768-2 (E.D.

Va. Apr. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kindley v. Hicks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kindley-v-hicks-ca4-2002.