Kinder v. Kinder

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kinder v. Kinder

896 S.W.2d 679, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 624, 1995 WL 128492

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kinder v. Kinder. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 532 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 28, 1995·No. No. 65598·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from that portion of a dissolution decree awarding wife maintenance. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from that portion of a dissolution decree awarding wife maintenance. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Kinder v. Kinder, 896 S.W.2d 679, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 624, 1995 WL 128492 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

896 S.W.2d 679 (Kinder v. Kinder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.