Kinder v. Kan. City Auto Acquisitions, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kinder v. Kan. City Auto Acquisitions, Inc.

553 S.W.3d 343

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 24, 2018

DocketWD 80999

StatusPublished

This text of 553 S.W.3d 343 (Kinder v. Kan. City Auto Acquisitions, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kinder v. Kan. City Auto Acquisitions, Inc., 553 S.W.3d 343 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam:

Appellants Kansas City Auto Acquisitions Inc., d/b/a State Line Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram, and David Wayne Caldwell ("Caldwell") (collectively, "State Line") appeal the order of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri denying State Line's Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration ("Motion") in a civil action brought against it by Travis Kinder and Nicole Kinder (collectively, the *344"Kinders"). The order is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

Appellants Kansas City Auto Acquisitions Inc., d/b/a State Line Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram, and David Wayne Caldwell ("Caldwell") (collectively, "State Line") appeal the order of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri denying State Line's Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration ("Motion") in a civil action brought against it by Travis Kinder and Nicole Kinder (collectively, the *344"Kinders"). The order is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

553 S.W.3d 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinder-v-kan-city-auto-acquisitions-inc-moctapp-2018.