Kinchen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kinchen v. State

508 So. 2d 51, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8642

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 10, 1987·No. No. 81-2133·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Marshall, 476 So.2d 150 (Fla.1985); Lusk v. State, 446 So.2d 1038 (Fla.1984); and McCray v. State, 416 So.2d 804 (Fla.1982). As we recently did in Ciccarelli v. State, 508 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), we certify the following as a question of great public importance:

IS IT NECESSARY, IN EVALUATING AN ASSERTION OF HARMLESS ERROR IN A CRIMINAL APPEAL, THAT EACH APPELLATE JUDGE INDEPENDENTLY READ THE COMPLETE TRIAL RECORD?

[52] HERSEY, C.J., concurs in result only. ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Marshall, 476 So.2d 150 (Fla.1985); Lusk v. State, 446 So.2d 1038 (Fla.1984); and McCray v. State, 416 So.2d 804 (Fla.1982). As we recently did in Ciccarelli v. State, 508 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), we certify the following as a question of great public importance:

IS IT NECESSARY, IN EVALUATING AN ASSERTION OF HARMLESS ERROR IN A CRIMINAL APPEAL, THAT EACH APPELLATE JUDGE INDEPENDENTLY READ THE COMPLETE TRIAL RECORD?

[52] HERSEY, C.J., concurs in result only. ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., concur.

Kinchen v. State, 508 So. 2d 51, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8642 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

508 So. 2d 51 (Kinchen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related