Kinchen v. State
508 So. 2d 51, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8642
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 10, 1987
DocketNo. 81-2133
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 508 So. 2d 51 (Kinchen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kinchen v. State, 508 So. 2d 51, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8642 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
Opinion
Affirmed. See State v. Marshall, 476 So.2d 150 (Fla.1985); Lusk v. State, 446 So.2d 1038 (Fla.1984); and McCray v. State, 416 So.2d 804 (Fla.1982). As we recently did in Ciccarelli v. State, 508 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), we certify the following as a question of great public importance:
IS IT NECESSARY, IN EVALUATING AN ASSERTION OF HARMLESS ERROR IN A CRIMINAL APPEAL, THAT EACH APPELLATE JUDGE INDEPENDENTLY READ THE COMPLETE TRIAL RECORD?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kinchen v. State
531 So. 2d 133 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
508 So. 2d 51, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinchen-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.