Kincaid v. Smith (In re Kincaid)
This text of 671 F. App'x 676 (Kincaid v. Smith (In re Kincaid)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[677]*677MEMORANDUM
Chapter 7 debtors Estrella A. Kincaid and James Kincaid appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing their bankruptcy appeal for failure to prosecute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d), 1291. We affirm.
In their opening brief, debtors fail to address how the district court erred in dismissing their bankruptcy appeal. As a result, they have waived their appeal of the dismissal order. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[0]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”); see also Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant, and a bare assertion does not preserve a claim.... ”).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 F. App'x 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kincaid-v-smith-in-re-kincaid-ca9-2016.