Kincaid v. Johnson
47 Cal. 618
Opinion
This appeal is by the defendant from a judgment for $90. The answer admits that the defendant was liable to the plaintiff for the reñí of the property, but avers that the amount due was only $70. The proof as to the value of the rents was conflicting, and we cannot disturb the judgment on the ground that it was not justified by the evidence, in respect to the amount due. The appeal is frivolous, and was apparently taken for delay. ;
Judgment affirmed, with fifty per cent, damages. Remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kincaid v. Johnson, 47 Cal. 618 (Cal. 1874).
47 Cal. 618 (Kincaid v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Houser & Haines Manufacturing Co. v. Hargrove
59 P. 947 (California Supreme Court, 1900)
Lake County v. Sulphur Bank Quicksilver Mining Co.
4 P. 876 (California Supreme Court, 1884)