Kincaid v. Friedman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Kincaid v. Friedman

73 P. 52, 67 Kan. 838, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 362

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJuly 10, 1903

DocketNo. 12,742

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 P. 52 (Kincaid v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kincaid v. Friedman, 73 P. 52, 67 Kan. 838, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 362 (kan 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

There is an attempt to prosecute this proceeding in error upon a transcript. What is before us shows that there are other files which are not a part of the transcript, and the certificate of the clerk does not show that the papers attached are a true and correct transcript of the record in the case. Therefore, this court has no jurisdiction to examine the alleged errors.

' The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

There is an attempt to prosecute this proceeding in error upon a transcript. What is before us shows that there are other files which are not a part of the transcript, and the certificate of the clerk does not show that the papers attached are a true and correct transcript of the record in the case. Therefore, this court has no jurisdiction to examine the alleged errors.

' The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 P. 52, 67 Kan. 838, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kincaid-v-friedman-kan-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack