Kincaid v. Friedman

73 P. 52, 67 Kan. 838, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 362
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided July 10, 1903·No. No. 12,742·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

There is an attempt to prosecute this proceeding in error upon a transcript. What is before us shows that there are other files which are not a part of the transcript, and the certificate of the clerk does not show that the papers attached are a true and correct transcript of the record in the case. Therefore, this court has no jurisdiction to examine the alleged errors.

' The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kincaid v. Friedman, 73 P. 52, 67 Kan. 838, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 362 (kan 1903).

73 P. 52 (Kincaid v. Friedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Basin State Bank
296 P. 1074 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1931)