Kinard v. State

56 S.W.2d 873, 122 Tex. Crim. 551, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 53
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 1, 1933·No. No. 15576.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for assault to murder; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The bills of exception and statement of facts in this case were filed after the expiration of the statutory limit fixed for such filing, which is ninety days from the overruling of the motion for new trial. The order overruling the motion for new trial does not appear in the record, but from the order extending the time for filing the statement of facts, etc., it appears that the motion for new trial was overruled on May 3, 1932. Computation shows that ninety days from this date expired on August 1, 1932. The bills of exception and statement of facts were filed the following day, which was one day too late. See Jarrott v. State, 84 Texas Crim. Rep., 544. Hence we cannot consider the statement of facts or bills of exception.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kinard v. State, 56 S.W.2d 873, 122 Tex. Crim. 551, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 53 (Tex. 1933).

56 S.W.2d 873 (Kinard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parker v. State
64 S.W.2d 786 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)