Kinahan v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies
This text of 52 A.D.2d 845 (Kinahan v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding inter alia to stay arbitration, Aetna Life and Casualty Co., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 20, 1975, which (1) granted the application and (2) ordered it "to defend and cover Tedesco for the accident”. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The FS20 sent by appellant [847]*847evidenced the issuance of a policy for the period involved. The attempted cancellation of this policy by appellant was ineffective because its notice of termination was insufficient under the terms of subdivision 1 of section 313 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. Furthermore, from the record herein, it appears that appellant failed to notify the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of the termination by cancellation, pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 313 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. Accordingly, therefore, appellant remained liable and obligated to defend its insured (see Capra v Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 31 NY2d 760). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 A.D.2d 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinahan-v-firemans-fund-american-insurance-companies-nyappdiv-1976.