Kimsey ex rel. Kimsey v. Reaves
This text of 91 S.E.2d 898 (Kimsey ex rel. Kimsey v. Reaves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only assignments of error, other than formal ones, brought up for consideration are based upon exceptions to various portions of the charge as given to the jury. The charge, as set forth in the case on appeal, covers forty-eight printed pages, and when read disconnectedly there are portions which are not free from error. However, when read contextually in the light of the allegations in the pleadings, and of evidence offered by the respective parties, the Court holds that prejudicial error is not made to appear.
Hence, in the judgment below there is
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E.2d 898, 243 N.C. 690, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimsey-ex-rel-kimsey-v-reaves-nc-1956.