Kimraj v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kimraj v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

898 So. 2d 993, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2693, 2005 WL 497184

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 4, 2005·No. No. 5D04-1737·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Doris Kimraj appeals an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission denying her eligibility for benefits. Based on the limited record before us, we agree that Kimraj was properly disqualified from receiving benefits chargeable to Dillard’s, her short-term, part-time employer. However, Kimraj was a full-time employee of the Merristar Hotel for thirteen years, until she was furloughed and applied for unemployment compensation benefits two days later. It appears that the Commission failed to determine her eligibility for benefits due to her separation of her employment at the Merristar Hotel.

Accordingly, we affirm the denial of benefits chargeable to Dillard’s, but remand this matter for further consideration of Kimraj’s eligibility for benefits based on her employment with the Merristar Hotel.

AFFIRMED IN PART and REMANDED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Doris Kimraj appeals an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission denying her eligibility for benefits. Based on the limited record before us, we agree that Kimraj was properly disqualified from receiving benefits chargeable to Dillard’s, her short-term, part-time employer. However, Kimraj was a full-time employee of the Merristar Hotel for thirteen years, until she was furloughed and applied for unemployment compensation benefits two days later. It appears that the Commission failed to determine her eligibility for benefits due to her separation of her employment at the Merristar Hotel.

Accordingly, we affirm the denial of benefits chargeable to Dillard’s, but remand this matter for further consideration of Kimraj’s eligibility for benefits based on her employment with the Merristar Hotel.

AFFIRMED IN PART and REMANDED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Kimraj v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 898 So. 2d 993, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2693, 2005 WL 497184 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

898 So. 2d 993 (Kimraj v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.