Kimmons v. State

190 So. 2d 308, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3290
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 21, 1966
DocketNo. 34781
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 190 So. 2d 308 (Kimmons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kimmons v. State, 190 So. 2d 308, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3290 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, 178 So.2d 608, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this court.

Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits.

After a thorough consideration of the petition and record we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, [309]*309that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Brinkley
837 P.2d 20 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1992)
Viera v. State
490 So. 2d 1332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Ivory v. State
351 So. 2d 26 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 So. 2d 308, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimmons-v-state-fla-1966.