Kimmons v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Kimmons v. State

190 So. 2d 308, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3290

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 21, 1966·No. No. 34781·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, 178 So.2d 608, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this court.

Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits.

After a thorough consideration of the petition and record we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, [309]*309that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, 178 So.2d 608, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this court.

Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits.

After a thorough consideration of the petition and record we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, [309]*309that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Kimmons v. State, 190 So. 2d 308, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3290 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

190 So. 2d 308 (Kimmons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related