Kimmelsman v. Bishop
This text of 251 A.D. 724 (Kimmelsman v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint modified by granting the motion as to the fourth and eighth separate causes of action, and as so modified affirmed, ’ without costs. The first, second, third, fifth, sixth, seventh and ninth causes of ' action set out in the complaint properly state causes of action to have transfers , of property set aside on the ground of fraud pursuant to the provisions of article ^0 of the Debtor and Creditor Law. The fourth and eighth causes of action are actions at law, demanding money judgments on the same claim on which plaintiff already has a money judgment against the individual defendant, as alleged in paragraph twelfth of the eo—nlaint. These causes of action are not within the purview of section 278 of t’ ' debtor and Creditor Law. Carswell, Adel, Taylor ' and Close, JJ., concur; r ky, P. J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D. 724, 295 N.Y.S. 601, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimmelsman-v-bishop-nyappdiv-1937.