Kimmelsman v. Bishop

251 A.D. 724, 295 N.Y.S. 601, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7238
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 7, 1937·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint modified by granting the motion as to the fourth and eighth separate causes of action, and as so modified affirmed, ’ without costs. The first, second, third, fifth, sixth, seventh and ninth causes of ' action set out in the complaint properly state causes of action to have transfers , of property set aside on the ground of fraud pursuant to the provisions of article ^0 of the Debtor and Creditor Law. The fourth and eighth causes of action are actions at law, demanding money judgments on the same claim on which plaintiff already has a money judgment against the individual defendant, as alleged in paragraph twelfth of the eo—nlaint. These causes of action are not within the purview of section 278 of t’ ' debtor and Creditor Law. Carswell, Adel, Taylor ' and Close, JJ., concur; r ky, P. J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kimmelsman v. Bishop, 251 A.D. 724, 295 N.Y.S. 601, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7238 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

251 A.D. 724 (Kimmelsman v. Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vinlis Construction Co. v. Roreck
67 Misc. 2d 942 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)
James v. Powell
25 A.D.2d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Reconstruction Syndicate, Inc. v. Sharpe
186 Misc. 897 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1946)
Rudin v. Steinbugler
103 F.2d 323 (Second Circuit, 1939)
Irving Trust Co. v. Kaminsky
22 F. Supp. 362 (S.D. New York, 1937)