Kimmelman v. HEATHER DOWNS MANAGEMENT LIMITED
756 N.W.2d 58, 482 Mich. 989
This text of 756 N.W.2d 58 (Kimmelman v. HEATHER DOWNS MANAGEMENT LIMITED) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kimmelman v. HEATHER DOWNS MANAGEMENT LIMITED, 756 N.W.2d 58, 482 Mich. 989 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
David KIMMELMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HEATHER DOWNS MANAGEMENT LIMITED and Legacy Golf Course, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 15, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
756 N.W.2d 58, 482 Mich. 989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimmelman-v-heather-downs-management-limited-mich-2008.