Kimmel v. Quigg

111 So. 893, 93 Fla. 206
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 7, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 111 So. 893 (Kimmel v. Quigg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kimmel v. Quigg, 111 So. 893, 93 Fla. 206 (Fla. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case plaintiff in error was convicted under agreed statment of facts in the Municipal Court of the City of Miami, Florida, of violation of a Municipal Ordinance requiring a license tax of $25.00 per day for each day, or fractional part of a day, that auction sales were conducted or carried on in a place of business.

On being so convicted he sued out writ of habeas corpus before the Circuit Judge. On hearing he was remanded to the custody of the Chief of Police of the City of Miami, Florida, for execution of sentence. From this judgment he has brought writ or error to this Court.

Having considered the record, it appears to us that the judgment of the Circuit Judge should be affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of Gillis ex rel. v. Croft, — Fla.—, 109 Sou. 446, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J. , concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quigg v. State Ex Rel. Miller
199 So. 489 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 So. 893, 93 Fla. 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimmel-v-quigg-fla-1927.