Kimma v. Leonard Chazen, Inc.
8 Misc. 2d 589, 169 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3502
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 14, 1957·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The purpose of an oral indorsement is merely to apprise the defendant of the nature of the cause of action which function was served here by the indorsement.
The summary statement of the cause of action indorsed on the summons was legally sufficient pursuant to section 78 of the Municipal Court Code.
The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kimma v. Leonard Chazen, Inc., 8 Misc. 2d 589, 169 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).
8 Misc. 2d 589 (Kimma v. Leonard Chazen, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Household Coal & Oil Distributors, Inc. v. Sage
57 Misc. 2d 428 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1968)