Kimma v. Leonard Chazen, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kimma v. Leonard Chazen, Inc.

8 Misc. 2d 589, 169 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3502

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1957

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 Misc. 2d 589 (Kimma v. Leonard Chazen, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kimma v. Leonard Chazen, Inc., 8 Misc. 2d 589, 169 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The purpose of an oral indorsement is merely to apprise the defendant of the nature of the cause of action which function was served here by the indorsement.

The summary statement of the cause of action indorsed on the summons was legally sufficient pursuant to section 78 of the Municipal Court Code.

The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant.

Heoht, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI