Kimen v. Atlas Exchange Nat. Bank of Chicago

295 U.S. 215, 55 S. Ct. 677, 79 L. Ed. 1398, 1935 U.S. LEXIS 318
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 29, 1935·No. 662·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Stone

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case, which comes here on certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, is a companion case to Awotin v. Atlas Exchange National Bank of Chicago, decided this day, ante, p. 209.

On November 2, 1929, petitioner purchased of respondent, a national banking association, four $1,000 mortgage bonds of the First National Company Collateral Trust. As an inducement and consideration for the purchase, the respondent agreed to repurchase the bonds at their maturity, at par and accrued interest. In a suit brought by petitioner, to recover for breach of the contract and in general assumpsit to recover the purchase price of the

*216 bonds, the trial court gave judgment for petitioner, which was reversed by the Appellate Court, 275 Ill. App. 638 (opinion not reported), following its decision in Awotin v. Atlas Exchange National Bank, supra. The Supreme Court of the State denied leave to appeal. The issues raised are the same as those in the Awotin case. For the reasons stated in our opinion in that case, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kimen v. Atlas Exchange Nat. Bank of Chicago, 295 U.S. 215, 55 S. Ct. 677, 79 L. Ed. 1398, 1935 U.S. LEXIS 318 (1935).

295 U.S. 215 (Kimen v. Atlas Exchange Nat. Bank of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Awotin v. Abrams
33 N.E.2d 179 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1941)
A. C. Frost & Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Mines Corp.
312 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 1941)