Kime v. Ladd

211 P. 628, 112 Kan. 603, 1923 Kan. LEXIS 441
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided January 6, 1923·No. No. 24,153·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BueCH, J.:

The action was one by the depositors in a bank, to recover from the receiver the amounts of their deposits, as trust funds. The plaintiffs prevailed, and the defendant appeals.

' On January 18, 1921, the bank was hopelessly insolvent, and a draft for $52,000, drawn by the county treasurer against his account in the bank, went to protest. On the next day the bank continued to do business, and accepted the deposits sued for. Its conduct amounted to a fraud on the depositors. (20 A. L. R., 1206, annotation; 7 C. J. 730; 3 R. C. L. 557.) The proof was that the assets which came into the hands of the receiver were augmented by the full amounts of the deposits. That being true, the plaintiffs were entitled to recover the deposits, as trust funds. (Secrest v. Ladd, Receiver, ante p. 23, 209 Pac. 824.)

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kime v. Ladd, 211 P. 628, 112 Kan. 603, 1923 Kan. LEXIS 441 (kan 1923).

211 P. 628 (Kime v. Ladd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dewey v. Commercial State Bank
41 P.2d 1006 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1935)
First National Bank v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.
175 S.E. 775 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1934)
Hays Co. v. A.E. Wilde
33 P.2d 395 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1934)
Security National Bank v. Payne
15 P.2d 410 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1932)
Cheney v. Johnson
11 P.2d 709 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1932)
Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. Docking
257 P. 743 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1927)