Kimbrough v. Port Cooper/T.Smith

Fifth Circuit

Kimbrough v. Port Cooper/T.Smith

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 5, 1998

Docket97-60144

StatusUnpublished

This text of Kimbrough v. Port Cooper/T.Smith (Kimbrough v. Port Cooper/T.Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kimbrough v. Port Cooper/T.Smith, (5th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-60144 Summary Calendar

RAYMOND KIMBROUGH

Petitioner

VERSUS

PORT COOPER/T SMITH STEVEDORING; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER’S COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Respondents

Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board (95-1697) April 30, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Raymond Kimbrough, a crane operator, appeals the denial of his

claim for benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’

Compensation Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. §901, et seq. and the

regulations promulgated thereunder. The Decision and Order of the

Administrative Law Judge was affirmed without opinion by the

1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. 47.5.4. benefits Review Board.

We have carefully reviewed the record and determine that the

Administrative Law Judge’s findings of fact are supported by

substantial evidence. Marathon Oil Co. v. Lunsford, 733 F.2d 1139,

1141 (5th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, we AFFIRM.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI