Kimbrough v. Pitts
63 Ga. 496
Opinion
The syllabus and authorities there referred to, with the facts reported by the reporter, will indicate with sufficient clearness the judgment of this court affirming the ruling below, without elaborating the case more fully or giving further reasons for this judgment. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kimbrough v. Pitts, 63 Ga. 496 (Ga. 1879).
63 Ga. 496 (Kimbrough v. Pitts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Highway Department v. Hester
143 S.E.2d 658 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
In Re Grimes' Estate
131 P.2d 448 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1943)
Argeropoulos v. Kansas City Railways Co.
212 S.W. 369 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1919)
Corbin v. McCrary
96 S.E. 445 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Morse v. Turner
92 S.E. 767 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Cohen v. Brunson
80 S.E. 679 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Screws v. Anderson
52 S.E. 429 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
McDermid v. Judge
49 S.E. 800 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Dieter v. Ragsdale
47 S.E. 942 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Walker v. Equitable Mortgage Co.
40 S.E. 1010 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Shecut v. Trubee
26 S.E. 60 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)
Booten v. Bank of the Empire State
67 Ga. 358 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1881)