Kimbrell v. State
115 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 677
This text of 115 So. 923 (Kimbrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kimbrell v. State, 115 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 677 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of the offense of grand larceny. We are of the opinion the evidence tending to show the value of the coat alleged to have been stolen by appellant was legally sufficient. Its weight was for the jury. The ease appears to have been properly tried, and we do not find any reversible error. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
115 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimbrell-v-state-alactapp-1928.