Kimble v. State

539 S.W.3d 741
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 17, 2017
DocketNo. ED 104728
StatusPublished

This text of 539 S.W.3d 741 (Kimble v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kimble v. State, 539 S.W.3d 741 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Myron Jamar Kimble ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's Judgment denying Movant's amended Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 S.W.3d 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimble-v-state-moctapp-2017.