Kimble v. State, Department of Commerce & Economic Development, Board of Nursing

Alaska Supreme Court

Kimble v. State, Department of Commerce & Economic Development, Board of Nursing

928 P.2d 1201, 1996 Alas. LEXIS 159, 1996 WL 742452

Alaska Supreme Court·Decided December 27, 1996·No. S-6755·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

1. The superior court correctly resolved all of the issues addressed in its opinion dated October 26,1994.

*1202 2. The only additional issue presented on appeal is whether the Board of Nursing should have had transcripts prepared of the hearing before the hearing officer. Since the Board of Nursing adopted the proposed decision of the hearing officer in its entirety, a transcript was not required. AS 44.62.500(b) and (c).

3. The judgment of the superior court is AFFIRMED.

FABE, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

1. The superior court correctly resolved all of the issues addressed in its opinion dated October 26,1994.

*1202 2. The only additional issue presented on appeal is whether the Board of Nursing should have had transcripts prepared of the hearing before the hearing officer. Since the Board of Nursing adopted the proposed decision of the hearing officer in its entirety, a transcript was not required. AS 44.62.500(b) and (c).

3. The judgment of the superior court is AFFIRMED.

FABE, J., not participating.

Kimble v. State, Department of Commerce & Economic Development, Board of Nursing, 928 P.2d 1201, 1996 Alas. LEXIS 159, 1996 WL 742452 (Ala. 1996).

Pincite

928 P.2d 1201 (Kimble v. State, Department of Commerce & Economic Development, Board of Nursing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

3. The judgment of the superior court is AFFIRMED.

Related