Kimble v. State Board of Elections

Fourth Circuit

Kimble v. State Board of Elections

120 F. App'x 466

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 1, 2005

DocketNo. 04-1874

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 120 F. App'x 466 (Kimble v. State Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kimble v. State Board of Elections, 120 F. App'x 466 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John B. Kimble appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Kimble v. Maryland, No. CA-02-2984-8 (D. Md. June 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

John B. Kimble appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Kimble v. Maryland, No. CA-02-2984-8 (D. Md. June 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 F. App'x 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimble-v-state-board-of-elections-ca4-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack