Kimble v. Midfirst Bank

Fourth Circuit

Kimble v. Midfirst Bank

56 F. App'x 204

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2003·No. No. 03-1037·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John B. Kimble appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his petition for injunctive relief for lack of diversity juris[205] diction and denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kimble v. Midfirst Bank, No. CA-02-3869-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 27, 2002; filed Dec. 20, 2002, & entered Dec. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John B. Kimble appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his petition for injunctive relief for lack of diversity juris[205] diction and denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kimble v. Midfirst Bank, No. CA-02-3869-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 27, 2002; filed Dec. 20, 2002, & entered Dec. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Kimble v. Midfirst Bank, 56 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

56 F. App'x 204 (Kimble v. Midfirst Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.