Kimble v. Midfirst Bank

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 28, 2003
• Docket: 03-1037
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1037

JOHN B. KIMBLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant, and

KAY J. KIMBLE,

Plaintiff,

versus

MIDFIRST BANK; AARON R. CARUSO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 02-3869-PJM)

Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: February 28, 2003

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John B. Kimble, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

John B. Kimble appeals the district court’s orders dismissing

his petition for injunctive relief for lack of diversity

jurisdiction and denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P.

59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Kimble v. Midfirst Bank, No. CA-02-3869-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 27, 2002;

filed Dec. 20, 2002, & entered Dec. 23, 2002). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED