Kimble v. Joslin

1 Tenn. 379
Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity·Decided October 6, 1808·Published

Opinion

Debt, upon a bond with a collateral condition. — The condition was for building a house in a manner specified in a former bond.

Under the plea of non infregit conventionem, parol evidence was offered to show what the former bond required, stating it would be proved that the defendant had that bond. This evidence cannot be received unless reasonable notice had been given to produce that bond on the trial, and then, on failure to do so, parol evidence might be received. See 1 Johns. 340; 1 Day 103.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kimble v. Joslin, 1 Tenn. 379 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1808).

1 Tenn. 379 (Kimble v. Joslin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Waring v. Warren
1 Johns. 340 (New York Supreme Court, 1806)