Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Kimble v. Gray

Kimble v. Gray

853 S.W.2d 890, 313 Ark. 373, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 336
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJune 1, 1991
Docket92-1486
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 853 S.W.2d 890 (Kimble v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kimble v. Gray, 853 S.W.2d 890, 313 Ark. 373, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 336 (Ark. 1991).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We granted Rhonda Kimble’s petition for review of the court of appeals’ per curiam granting dismissal of her appeal. Appellee, now respondent, Robert Gray, Sr., previously asked the court of appeals to determine that Kimble had failed to file a timely appeal. The court of appeals found Kimble had filed her notice of appeal one day too early, and under the terms of Rule 4(c) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court held Kimble’s notice of appeal had no effect. The court of appeals’ per curiam, Kimble v. Gray, Sr., 40 Ark. App. 196, 842 S.W.2d 473 (1992), succinctly sets out that court’s authority and reasons for dismissing Kimble’s appeal. Because we agree with the court of appeals’ per curiam and ruling, we merely affirm its decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glass v. State
16 S.W.3d 543 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)
Chickasaw Chemical Co. v. Beasley
944 S.W.2d 511 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1997)
Glover v. Langford
894 S.W.2d 959 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1995)
Lawrence Bros., Inc. v. RJ" Bob" Jones Excavating Contractor, Inc.
884 S.W.2d 620 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1994)
Mangiapane v. State
858 S.W.2d 128 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
853 S.W.2d 890, 313 Ark. 373, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimble-v-gray-ark-1991.