Kimberly Woodfork v. Bank of America

Opinion

Order filed April 11, 2013

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00927-CV

____________

KIMBERLY WOODFORK, Appellant

V.

BANK OF AMERICA, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1018590

ORDER

On April 1, 2013, appellant filed a brief that is not in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The brief fails generally to comply with the rules. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k).

Accordingly, we order appellant's brief filed April 1, 2013, stricken.

Appellant is ordered to file a brief that complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure on or before April 22, 2013, of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k).

If appellant files another brief that does not comply with Rule 38, the Court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has failed to file a brief, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. If appellant fails to timely file a brief in accordance with Rule 38, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison and Busby.