Kimberly Wilbon v. Daniel Goff

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 9, 2025·No. 24-2534·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 24-2534

Kimberly Laniece Wilbon

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Daniel E. Goff; Diana K. Dean; Lisa G. Brown; Leslie R. Hell; Lloyd J. Austin, III

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

Submitted: March 31, 2025 Filed: April 9, 2025

[Unpublished]

Before SMITH, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Kimberly Wilbon appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing her pro se employment-related action. Upon de novo review, we find no basis for reversal. See

1 The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Dittmer Props., L.P. v. FDIC, 708 F.3d 1011, 1016 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kimberly Wilbon v. Daniel Goff, (8th Cir. 2025).

Kimberly Wilbon v. Daniel Goff (Kimberly Wilbon v. Daniel Goff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dittmer Properties, L.P. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
708 F.3d 1011 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)