Kimberly v. Blackford
This text of 22 How. Pr. 443 (Kimberly v. Blackford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
According to the views and principles adopted in the case of this plaintiff against Duncan L. Stewart, argued at this term, (reported ante, page 281,) the motions in these cases must be denied. It is not shown or intimated that the actions were not commenced and prosecuted in the most perfect good faith, nor does the moving affidavit show in any way that any legal defence to the action exists. The matters in this case shown, different from those in the case referred to, relate to the sufficiency of the fund of which the plaintiff is trustee, and do not, [444]*444even in that view, make a case showing that the fund, when the trust shall be closed up, will be insufficient for the payment of all just claims against it.
The motions are denied, with seven dollars costs in each case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 How. Pr. 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimberly-v-blackford-nysupct-1861.