Kimberly Services, Inc. v. Bakker

187 A.D.2d 411, 590 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12541

This text of 187 A.D.2d 411 (Kimberly Services, Inc. v. Bakker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kimberly Services, Inc. v. Bakker, 187 A.D.2d 411, 590 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff and the defendant Georgia Bakker separately appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.), dated October 25, 1990, which granted the motion of the defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and the cross claim against it.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The appellants have failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). Thompson, J. P., Harwood, Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 A.D.2d 411, 590 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimberly-services-inc-v-bakker-nyappdiv-1992.