Kimberly Mitchell v. Social Security Department, Ms. Barrios, Kerrie Mooney, Aisha Sewell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Kimberly Mitchell v. Social Security Department, Ms. Barrios, Kerrie Mooney, Aisha Sewell

DecidedAugust 28, 2012

Docket14-12-00562-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Kimberly Mitchell v. Social Security Department, Ms. Barrios, Kerrie Mooney, Aisha Sewell (Kimberly Mitchell v. Social Security Department, Ms. Barrios, Kerrie Mooney, Aisha Sewell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kimberly Mitchell v. Social Security Department, Ms. Barrios, Kerrie Mooney, Aisha Sewell, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 28, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00562-CV

KIMBERLY MITCHELL, Appellant

V.

SOCIAL SECURITY DEPARTMENT, MS. BARRIOS, KERRIE MOONEY, and AISHA SEWELL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010-36435

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 11, 2012, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal in an apparent attempt to appeal a dismissal order signed February 9, 2012. No clerk’s record has been filed in this appeal. The clerk responsible for preparing the record informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. We have not been notified that appellant has claimed or established indigence so that she may proceed on appeal without the advance payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. On July 19, 2012, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof thereof. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment or payment arrangements for the record. Nor has she filed any other response to this court’s notice.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 28, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00562-CV

KIMBERLY MITCHELL, Appellant

V.

SOCIAL SECURITY DEPARTMENT, MS. BARRIOS, KERRIE MOONEY, and AISHA SEWELL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010-36435

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 11, 2012, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal in an apparent attempt to appeal a dismissal order signed February 9, 2012. No clerk’s record has been filed in this appeal. The clerk responsible for preparing the record informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. We have not been notified that appellant has claimed or established indigence so that she may proceed on appeal without the advance payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. On July 19, 2012, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof thereof. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment or payment arrangements for the record. Nor has she filed any other response to this court’s notice.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Kimberly Mitchell v. Social Security Department, Ms. Barrios, Kerrie Mooney, Aisha Sewell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimberly-mitchell-v-social-security-department-ms--texapp-2012.