Kimberly Mitchell v. Chase Bank, Tarad RaShawn Bessard, Tanya Johnson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Kimberly Mitchell v. Chase Bank, Tarad RaShawn Bessard, Tanya Johnson

DecidedMarch 27, 2015

Docket14-14-00928-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Kimberly Mitchell v. Chase Bank, Tarad RaShawn Bessard, Tanya Johnson (Kimberly Mitchell v. Chase Bank, Tarad RaShawn Bessard, Tanya Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kimberly Mitchell v. Chase Bank, Tarad RaShawn Bessard, Tanya Johnson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

MANDATE

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00928-CV

Kimberly Mitchell, Appellant Appealed from the 113th District Court v. of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2014- 44758). Opinion delivered Per Curiam. Chase Bank, Tarad RaShawn Bessard, Tanya Johnson, Appellees TO THE 113TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before our Court of Appeals on January 13, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its order in these words: Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order purportedly signed by the court below on November 14, 2014. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Kimberly Mitchell. We further order this decision certified below for observance. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice of our Fourteenth Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, March 27, 2015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MANDATE

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00928-CV

Kimberly Mitchell, Appellant Appealed from the 113th District Court v. of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2014- 44758). Opinion delivered Per Curiam. Chase Bank, Tarad RaShawn Bessard, Tanya Johnson, Appellees TO THE 113TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before our Court of Appeals on January 13, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its order in these words: Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order purportedly signed by the court below on November 14, 2014. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Kimberly Mitchell. We further order this decision certified below for observance. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice of our Fourteenth Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, March 27, 2015.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Kimberly Mitchell v. Chase Bank, Tarad RaShawn Bessard, Tanya Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimberly-mitchell-v-chase-bank-tarad-rashawn-bessard-tanya-johnson-texapp-2015.