Kimberly Glass v. Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture, LLC dba Silver Legacy Resort Casino MTM Transit, LLC

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided June 12, 2023·No. 3:23-cv-00169·Unknown

Opinion

Nevada Bar No. 6389 Alice.Herbolsheimer@lewisbrisbois.com ALISON R. KERTIS Nevada Bar No. 13875 Alison.Kertis@lewisbrisbois.com 5555 Kietzke Lane, Suite 200 Reno, Nevada 89511 Tel: 775.399.6383 Fax: 775.827.9256

Attorneys for Defendant Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture, LLC d/b/a Silver Legacy Resort Casino

*** KIMBERLY GLASS, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00169-ART-CLB

Plaintiff,

vs.

MTM TRANSIT, LLC; CIRCUS AND ELDORADO JOINT VENTURE, LLC d/b/a SILVER LEGACY RESORT CASINO; JOHN DOES I-XX, inclusive, ABC CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive; and BLACK AND WHITE COMPANIES, I-X, inclusive, Defendants.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff KIMBERLY GLASS, Defendant MTM TRANSIT, LLC, and Defendant CIRCUS AND ELDORADO JOINT VENTURE, LLC d/b/a SILVER LEGACY RESORT CASINO, the Parties to the above-entitled matter, by and through their respective counsel of record, that this matter may involve the production of confidential and proprietary business information, personal information, or other confidential or proprietary information during discovery, and also the likely presentation of such information to the Court. further stipulate that the disclosure of confidential and proprietary information in this action shall be governed by this Protective Order, as follows: 1. “Confidential Information” means any trade secret, research, development, commercial information, financial information, proprietary information, personal information of non-parties, proprietary client information, formulas, patterns, compilations, programs, devices, methods, techniques, processes, or other confidential information from which a party receives benefits (whether personal, economic, or otherwise and whether actual or potential) by not being generally known to the public. This Protective Order is designed to protect such information from public disclosure or use in other disputes. 2. Any party or third party to this action or any non-party that, in discovery, or in response to requests from another party in lieu of or in addition to discovery, produces, discloses, or receives any item of discovery, including, without limitation, any document, thing, interrogatory answer, deposition testimony, or admission, may designate the same as “CONFIDENTIAL” where it is believed in good faith the information contains Confidential Information. “CONFIDENTIAL” designations from third parties or non- parties shall be entitled to the same protection under this Protective Order as those made by any party or third party to this action. If a new party is added to this action, that new party may designate any previously produced item of discovery, including, without limitation, any document, thing, interrogatory answer, deposition testimony, or admission as “CONFIDENTIAL” within 60 days after it files its answer to the operative complaint. 3. If a party hereafter obtains documents from third parties during the course of this litigation pursuant to subpoena, the obtaining party shall provide a copy of those documents to the opposing party or parties. The opposing party or parties shall review those documents and may, within 21 days of receipt, designate any of those materials “CONFIDENTIAL” in accordance with this Protective Order. 4. The designation of protected information that exists in tangible form shall be made by form that cannot readily be marked in a visible fashion shall be specifically identified, when produced, in correspondence by the producing party’s or third party’s counsel. In the event the producing party, third party, or non-party elects to produce original files and records for inspection, and the inspecting party desires to inspect these files and records, no markings need be made by the producing party or third party in advance of the initial inspection. All documents within the produced files and records shall be considered marked as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Thereafter, upon selection of specified documents for copying by the inspecting party, the producing party or third party shall mark the copies of the documents containing confidential materials with the corresponding designation prior to producing the copies. Marking the first page of a multi-page document with a confidentiality designation shall be deemed a designation of all pages of such document under the same confidentiality designation, unless otherwise indicated by the producing party or third party. 5. Confidential Information shall not be used by any recipient or disclosed by anyone for any purpose other than in connection with the prosecution or defense of this specific action, and shall not be disclosed to anyone other than those persons designated in Paragraph 6, except as specified in this Protective Order. 6. Only the following persons may be allowed access to information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL”: a. Parties to this action, their counsel of record, and any insurer of a party that has an interest in the action; b. The Court, its staff, and court reporter(s); mediators or arbitrators, and their staff, as may be engaged in this matter; and court reporters and their staff, as may be engaged to appear at depositions or transcribe testimony in this matter; c. Outside litigation counsel of record in this action, and legal associates, paralegal assistants, clerical staff, data processing staff, and secretaries engaged in assisting such counsel with respect to this action; d. Upon compliance with the provisions of Paragraph 7 below, independent experts, litigation consultants (not regularly employed by either of the parties) employed by the parties or counsel of record for the parties, and fact witnesses whom counsel reasonably believe may be called by any party to this action to testify at the trial of this action; e. Employees, officers, and directors of any party whose access to the information is necessary to the prosecution or defense of this lawsuit; 7. Unless otherwise agreed between counsel for all of the parties in a written agreement signed by counsel for all parties or on the record in a deposition by counsel for all of the parties, no person authorized under Paragraph 6(d) to have access to Confidential Information shall be granted access to that information until that person has received and read a copy of this Protective Order and has agreed in writing to be bound hereby by signing form attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” 8. The disclosure or production of any document or other information shall be without prejudice to, and without waiver of, any claim that the document or information is protected from disclosure, production, or introduction into evidence by the work product doctrine, the attorney-client privilege, or any other privilege, immunity, or ground that protects the document or information from disclosure, production, or introduction into evidence. If any party, third party, or non-party inadvertently discloses or produces any document or information that may arguably be protected from disclosure by any privilege, doctrine, immunity, or other legal ground, the disclosing or producing party or third party or non-party shall, within ten (10) court days of the discovery of the inadvertent disclosure or production, notify the receiving party that it is asserting the privilege or doctrine. If the receiving and producing parties dispute whether the document is actually Confidential or protected by a privilege, immunity, doctrine, or other legal ground, they shall follow the procedures as outlined in Paragraph 11. after receipt of a final deposition transcript, a party, third party, or non-party may designate specific portions of the transcript that contain or cover information or documents that may be considered Confidential Information. The designation shall be made on the record or in writing, setting forth the designated page numbers and lines from the deposition transcript, and shall be served upon all counsel. In order to give the parties an opportunity to review the tr

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kimberly Glass v. Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture, LLC dba Silver Legacy Resort Casino MTM Transit, LLC, (D. Nev. 2023).

Kimberly Glass v. Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture, LLC dba Silver Legacy Resort Casino MTM Transit, LLC (Kimberly Glass v. Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture, LLC dba Silver Legacy Resort Casino MTM Transit, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Lowell M. Birrell
447 F.2d 1168 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Bradley v. Sugarbaker
809 F.3d 8 (First Circuit, 2015)