Kimberly-Cherese Robinson v. Wells Fargo, N.A.
This text of Kimberly-Cherese Robinson v. Wells Fargo, N.A. (Kimberly-Cherese Robinson v. Wells Fargo, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 23-1831 ___________________________
Kimberly-Cherese Robinson
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Wells Fargo, N.A.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri ____________
Submitted: November 1, 2023 Filed: November 6, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________
Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Missouri resident Kimberly-Cherese Robinson appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her pro se complaint on res judicata grounds. Upon careful de novo
1 The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. review, see Smith v. Johnson, 779 F.3d 867, 870 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review), we conclude the district court did not err in finding the claims were barred by res judicata, see Taylor v. Sturgell, 553 U.S. 880, 891 (2008) (using federal common law to determine preclusive effect of federal court judgment in federal-question case); Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 742 (8th Cir. 1990) (stating elements of res judicata under federal law). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kimberly-Cherese Robinson v. Wells Fargo, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimberly-cherese-robinson-v-wells-fargo-na-ca8-2023.