Kimberly Berain v. State
This text of Kimberly Berain v. State (Kimberly Berain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00642-CR
Kimberly BERAIN, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006-CR-8738 Honorable Bert Richardson, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 29, 2008
DISMISSED
The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that the case is a “plea-bargain case, and
the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure
provides, “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right
of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
Appellant’s counsel filed a written notice with this court that counsel reviewed the record
and “can find no right of appeal for Appellant.” We construe this notice as an indication that
appellant will not seek to file an amended trial court certification showing that she has the right 04-08-00642-CR
of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 177
(Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). In light of the record presented, we agree with
appellant’s counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this
appeal is dismissed.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kimberly Berain v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimberly-berain-v-state-texapp-2008.