Kimberly Beddingfield v. David Earl Vaughn

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 4, 2012·No. 144727·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 4, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

144727 Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly KIMBERLY BEDDINGFIELD, Brian K. Zahra, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 144727 COA: 300471 Washtenaw CC: 09-001052-NI DAVID EARL VAUGHN and MATTHEW VAUGHN, Defendants, and

FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, and

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 19, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 4, 2012 _________________________________________ h0827 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kimberly Beddingfield v. David Earl Vaughn, (Mich. 2012).

Kimberly Beddingfield v. David Earl Vaughn (Kimberly Beddingfield v. David Earl Vaughn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.