Kimberly Anne Hutson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Kimberly Anne Hutson v. State

DecidedSeptember 12, 2019

Docket11-19-00037-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Kimberly Anne Hutson v. State (Kimberly Anne Hutson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kimberly Anne Hutson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Kimberly Anne Hutson, * From the 32nd District Court of Nolan County, Trial Court No. 12371.

Vs. No. 11-19-00037-CR * September 12, 2019

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting by assignment) (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we modify the judgment of the trial court (1) to reflect court costs of $366.50 (deleting the DNA community supervision fee of $34.00 and $22.50 of the time payment fee) and (2) to delete the following language: “$180.00 restitution to the Texas Department of Public Safety Crime Laboratory, Abilene, Texas; $ _____ attorney[’]s fees; and $50.00 Crime Stoppers”; “RESTITUTION: $180.00”; and CRIME STOPPERS: $50.00.” We affirm the judgment as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Kimberly Anne Hutson, * From the 32nd District Court of Nolan County, Trial Court No. 12371.

Vs. No. 11-19-00037-CR * September 12, 2019

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting by assignment) (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we modify the judgment of the trial court (1) to reflect court costs of $366.50 (deleting the DNA community supervision fee of $34.00 and $22.50 of the time payment fee) and (2) to delete the following language: “$180.00 restitution to the Texas Department of Public Safety Crime Laboratory, Abilene, Texas; $ _____ attorney[’]s fees; and $50.00 Crime Stoppers”; “RESTITUTION: $180.00”; and CRIME STOPPERS: $50.00.” We affirm the judgment as modified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Kimberly Anne Hutson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimberly-anne-hutson-v-state-texapp-2019.