Kimberly A. K. v. Ronald F. G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kimberly A. K. v. Ronald F. G.

266 A.D.2d 835, 697 N.Y.S.2d 790

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1999

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 A.D.2d 835 (Kimberly A. K. v. Ronald F. G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kimberly A. K. v. Ronald F. G., 266 A.D.2d 835, 697 N.Y.S.2d 790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner established by a fair preponderance of the evidence that respondent, by engaging in acts that constitute harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [3]), willfully violated a prior order of protection (see, Matter of Tina T. v Steven U., 243 AD2d 863, 864, lv denied 91 NY2d 805; Matter of Boyd v Boyd, 193 AD2d 1039, 1040; Matter of Maryanne PP. v Richard QQ., 192 AD2d 747, 748). “[I]n view of Family Court’s advantage of hearing the witnesses, its credibility determinations are not to be lightly set aside” (Matter of Maryanne PP. v Richard QQ., supra, at 748). (Appeal from Order of Jefferson County Family Court, Morgan, J. — Family Offense.) Present— Denman, P. J., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner established by a fair preponderance of the evidence that respondent, by engaging in acts that constitute harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [3]), willfully violated a prior order of protection (see, Matter of Tina T. v Steven U., 243 AD2d 863, 864, lv denied 91 NY2d 805; Matter of Boyd v Boyd, 193 AD2d 1039, 1040; Matter of Maryanne PP. v Richard QQ., 192 AD2d 747, 748). “[I]n view of Family Court’s advantage of hearing the witnesses, its credibility determinations are not to be lightly set aside” (Matter of Maryanne PP. v Richard QQ., supra, at 748). (Appeal from Order of Jefferson County Family Court, Morgan, J. — Family Offense.) Present— Denman, P. J., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 835, 697 N.Y.S.2d 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimberly-a-k-v-ronald-f-g-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack