Kimbell v. Chicago Hydraulic Press Brick Co.
194 U.S. 631, 24 S. Ct. 858, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 661
Opinion
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Argued April 27, 28, 1904. decided May 16, 1904, Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U. S. 405; Continental National Bank v. Buford, 191 U. S. 119; Tennessee v. Bank, 152 U. S. 454; Ansbro v. United States, 159 U. S. 695; Colorado Company v. Turck, 150 U. S. 138. Mr. Edmund Harvey Smalley for appellants. Mr. Edward Cunningham, Jr., and Mr. Edward C. Eliot for appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kimbell v. Chicago Hydraulic Press Brick Co., 194 U.S. 631, 24 S. Ct. 858, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 661 (1904).
194 U.S. 631 (Kimbell v. Chicago Hydraulic Press Brick Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Colorado Central Consolidated Mining Co. v. Turck
150 U.S. 138 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Tennessee v. Union & Planters' Bank
152 U.S. 454 (Supreme Court, 1894)
Ansbro v. United States
159 U.S. 695 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Continental Nat. Bank of Memphis v. Buford
191 U.S. 119 (Supreme Court, 1903)
Arbuckle v. Blackburn
191 U.S. 405 (Supreme Court, 1903)