Kimbell v. Chicago Hydraulic Press Brick Co.
This text of 194 U.S. 631 (Kimbell v. Chicago Hydraulic Press Brick Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Argued April 27, 28, 1904. decided May 16, 1904, Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U. S. 405; Continental National Bank v. Buford, 191 U. S. 119; Tennessee v. Bank, 152 U. S. 454; Ansbro v. United States, 159 U. S. 695; Colorado Company v. Turck, 150 U. S. 138. Mr. Edmund Harvey Smalley for appellants. Mr. Edward Cunningham, Jr., and Mr. Edward C. Eliot for appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 U.S. 631, 24 S. Ct. 858, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimbell-v-chicago-hydraulic-press-brick-co-scotus-1904.