Kimbark v. . Waldemar Company
111 N.E. 1089, 217 N.Y. 610, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1362
This text of 111 N.E. 1089 (Kimbark v. . Waldemar Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kimbark v. . Waldemar Company, 111 N.E. 1089, 217 N.Y. 610, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1362 (N.Y. 1916).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan and Cardozo, JJ. Dissenting: Seabury,. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 N.E. 1089, 217 N.Y. 610, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimbark-v-waldemar-company-ny-1916.