Kimball v. State

678 P.2d 675, 100 Nev. 190, 1984 Nev. LEXIS 348
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 29, 1984
DocketNo. 14482
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 678 P.2d 675 (Kimball v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kimball v. State, 678 P.2d 675, 100 Nev. 190, 1984 Nev. LEXIS 348 (Neb. 1984).

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam: 1

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of misdemeanor battery, as a lesser-included offense of battery with substantial bodily harm, a gross misdemeanor. Appellant contends that his judgment of conviction is void because the dis-i trict court lacks jurisdiction to convict and sentence on a misdemeanor, notwithstanding the fact that the misdemeanor is a lesser-included offense of the initially charged gross misdemeanor. This contention is without merit.

The original jurisdiction of the district court is in fact limited to felonies and gross misdemeanors, see Nev. Const, art. 6, § 6, and original jurisdiction over misdemeanors generally lies with the justice’s court, see NRS 4.370(3). Once a district court properly obtains original jurisdiction over a defendant by virtue of a felony or gross misdemeanor charge, however, its jurisdiction is maintained to convict and sentence on any lesser-included offense, even if that offense is a misdemeanor. See People v. Spreckels, 270 P.2d 513 (Cal.Ct.App. 1954); cf. Dicus v. District Court, 97 Nev. 273, 625 P.2d 1175 (1981) (adult court, once it properly obtained original jurisdiction from juvenile court by virtue of attempted murder charge, retained jurisdiction to convict and sentence on lesser-included offense, even when lesser-included offense, if charged alone at the outset of the proceedings, would not have removed case from juvenile court jurisdiction).

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Floyd (Zane) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court, 2022
Nevada v. Kopp
43 P.3d 340 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2002)
Barton v. State
30 P.3d 1103 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
678 P.2d 675, 100 Nev. 190, 1984 Nev. LEXIS 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimball-v-state-nev-1984.