Kimball v. State
This text of 37 S.E. 886 (Kimball v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Upon the trial of one accused of assault with intent to murder, where the evidence for the accused tends to show that there was a mutual combat between the parties, the law of manslaughter, as bearing upon the question whether the accused should be convicted of a lesser offense than that expressly charged in the indictment, is necessarily involved, and it is the duty of the judge, whether requested so to do or not, to charge the jury upon this subject, and a failure to do so is error.
2. A specific intent to murder is an essential ingredient of the crime of assault with intent to murder ; and where one is charged, as principal in the second degree, with assault with intent to murder, he can not be convicted unless it be shown that he not only aided in the act, but also participated ip the murderous design, Clark’s Crim. Law, 89, 90.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 S.E. 886, 112 Ga. 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimball-v-state-ga-1901.