Kimball v. Munson

2 Conn. Super. Ct. 3
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1786
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Conn. Super. Ct. 3 (Kimball v. Munson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kimball v. Munson, 2 Conn. Super. Ct. 3 (Colo. Ct. App. 1786).

Opinion

[5]*5Accepted by the Court:—

Judge Dyer

said that Wilson ought to have been found guilty, for he first set the matter in motion, and gave countenance to it after the plaintiff was brought back, and such acts of Pettit Tyranny ought to be severely checked.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Conn. Super. Ct. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimball-v-munson-connsuperct-1786.