Kimball v. Mack

10 Wend. 497
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1833
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 10 Wend. 497 (Kimball v. Mack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kimball v. Mack, 10 Wend. 497 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1833).

Opinion

Error from Jefferson common pleas. Kimball sued Mack in a justice’s court. On the return of the summons, the parties joined issue, and the cause was adjourned to a certain day, to wit, 26th December, at 1 o’clock P. M. at the justice’s office. On that day the justice was from home, and did not return to his office until three o’clock P. M., when he found Mack in a dwelling house adjoining his office, who told him that he and Kimball bad agreed to adjourn the cause until the tenth of January, at two P. M., and the same communication was made to the justice by another person, in behalf of Kimball; whereupon the justice entered an adjournment upon his docket until the tenth of January; on which day, at three P. M., he called the cause ; the defendant did not appear; the justice proceeded to hear proof on the part of the plaintiff, and rendered judgment in his favor. The common pleas of Jefferson, on certiorari, reversed the justice’s judgment, and this court, on writ of error, affirmed the judgment of the common pleas. Vide Tenny v. Filer, 8 Wendell, 569.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blowers v. Malone
75 Misc. 396 (New York County Courts, 1912)
Leonosio v. Bartilino
63 N.W. 543 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1895)
Young v. Conklin
23 N.Y.S. 993 (New York County Courts, 1893)
Redford v. Snow
12 N.Y. St. Rep. 323 (New York Supreme Court, 1887)
In re Ewing
8 F. Cas. 927 (D. Massachusetts, 1875)
Gillilan v. Spratt
3 Daly 440 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1871)
Merriam v. Baker
9 Minn. 40 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1864)
Stadler v. Moors
9 Mich. 264 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1861)
Peck v. Andrews
32 Barb. 445 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Hogan v. Baker
2 E.D. Smith 22 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1850)
Hard v. Shipman
6 Barb. 621 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)
Fanning v. Trowbridge
5 Hill & Den. 428 (New York Supreme Court, 1843)
Niles v. Hancock
44 Mass. 568 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1842)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Wend. 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimball-v-mack-nysupct-1833.