Kimball v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Kimball v. Kelly

66 R.I. 169

DecidedFebruary 20, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 66 R.I. 169 (Kimball v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kimball v. Kelly, 66 R.I. 169 (R.I. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After the filing of our opinion the complainant, by leave of court, filed a motion for reargument. We [170]*170have carefully considered said motion and the reasons- assigned therefor.

Charles R. Easton, for complainant. James J. Fogarty, Jr., Voigt, Wright, Munroe & Clason, for respondents.

However, as the motion contains no matter which was not fully considered and passed upon before the filing of our opinion, the motion is denied and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After the filing of our opinion the complainant, by leave of court, filed a motion for reargument. We [170]*170have carefully considered said motion and the reasons- assigned therefor.

Charles R. Easton, for complainant. James J. Fogarty, Jr., Voigt, Wright, Munroe & Clason, for respondents.

However, as the motion contains no matter which was not fully considered and passed upon before the filing of our opinion, the motion is denied and dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 R.I. 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimball-v-kelly-ri-1941.