Kimball v. Dunn

89 F. 782, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 3118

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The statutes provide for the appointment of a receiver of a national bank. Rev. St. U. S. § 5234. But it appears that in the cause at bar no receiver has yet been appointed. I am unable to assent to the proposition that because the comptroller of the currency, in conformity to the provision of section 5240, has appointed plaintiff as a suitable person to make an examination of the affairs of the bank, plaintiff thereby'’ became a temporary receiver. Until the comptroller decides to put the bank into the hands of a receiver, under section 5234, there is nothing in the statutes to support the contention that its tangible assets are exempt from levy under execution upon final judgment. Section 5242, by its terms, applies apparently only to “attachment, injunction, and execution * * * before final judgment.” Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kimball v. Dunn, 89 F. 782, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 3118 (circtsdny 1898).

89 F. 782 (Kimball v. Dunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.