Kimball v. Bruce
This text of 58 N.H. 327 (Kimball v. Bruce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant has made no effort, by brief or argument, to maintain his exception, and it is untenable. Carr v. Clough, 26 N. H. 280, 293, 294; Heath v. West, 28 N. H. 101, 110; Locke v. Smith, 41 N. H. 346, 353; Young v. Stevens, 48 N. H. 133, 137; Heath v. Stevens, 48 N. H. 251; 2 Kent Com. (12th ed.) 236, n. 1, 240; Benjamin on Sales, s. 27, n. If the chattels were necessaries, the plaintiff was not chargeable for more than their value.
Judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 N.H. 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimball-v-bruce-nh-1878.