Kimball v. Bruce

58 N.H. 327
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1878
StatusPublished

This text of 58 N.H. 327 (Kimball v. Bruce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kimball v. Bruce, 58 N.H. 327 (N.H. 1878).

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

The defendant has made no effort, by brief or argument, to maintain his exception, and it is untenable. Carr v. Clough, 26 N. H. 280, 293, 294; Heath v. West, 28 N. H. 101, 110; Locke v. Smith, 41 N. H. 346, 353; Young v. Stevens, 48 N. H. 133, 137; Heath v. Stevens, 48 N. H. 251; 2 Kent Com. (12th ed.) 236, n. 1, 240; Benjamin on Sales, s. 27, n. If the chattels were necessaries, the plaintiff was not chargeable for more than their value.

Judgment on the verdict.

Bingham, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 N.H. 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kimball-v-bruce-nh-1878.