Kim v. U.S. Secretary of The Interior

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL KIM, et al., Case No. 1:16-cv-01656-JLT-SKO

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 13 v. (Doc. 84) 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

15 Defendant. 16

17 18 On May 11, 2022, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. 19 (Doc. 84.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 21 dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23

24 Dated: May 12, 2022 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25

28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28